Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
149-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

149-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.003741 50.852606)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.003670 50.852599,-1.003673 50.852613,-1.003683 50.852625,-1.003699 50.852635,-1.003718 50.852642,-1.003740 50.852644,-1.003762 50.852642,-1.003782 50.852636,-1.003798 50.852626,-1.003808 50.852614,-1.003812 50.852600,-1.003809 50.852586,-1.003799 50.852573,-1.003784 50.852563,-1.003764 50.852557,-1.003742 50.852554,-1.003720 50.852556,-1.003700 50.852563,-1.003684 50.852572,-1.003674 50.852585,-1.003670 50.852599)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL